You’ll recall that 4 to 6 weeks ago, I described a discussion going on at the WebMD heart.org forum about Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Calcium Scanning, and dramatic reductions in cardiac events in patients.
Among the things Dr. William Davis of TrackYourPlaque.com and the HeartScanBlog mentioned in that thread is that, in his cardiology practice, optimal Vitamin D levels were essential to coronary plaque regression.
At least one other doctor questioned Dr. Davis about it because there haven’t been significant studies showing Vitamin D level to be critical. No single other doctor at the WebMD forum spoke up and seconded Dr. D.’s point about Vitamin D.
Well, things will be different from this point forward now that the journal Circulation has just published an online version of a study showing that Vitamin D deficiency “may adversely affect the cardiovascular system.”
The study conclusion also states that
further clinical and experimental studies may be warranted to determine whether correction of vitamin D deficiency could contribute to the prevention of cardiovascular disease.
What do you think? Should I wait another 2 to 5 years for these additional studies to be completed and published or should I supplement with Vitamin D3 now? More generally, is it any wonder why an increasing number of informed lay persons take Dr. Davis more seriously than they take their own doctor? He is years ahead of where most of his colleagues are when it comes to understanding the requirements for coronary plaque regression.
The study abstract follows the jump…



